Issues/442 prod pipeline dit - #58
Conversation
Run the shared iaas deploy script with PHASE=dry_run before the real production deploy while keeping the public docs build on GitHub-hosted runners and deploy secrets on the YOW production job.
Adds the docs-owned production deployment workflow that builds a selected release ref on a clean runner, fetches the shared iaas deploy runner, runs dry-run before deploy, and documents the production release flow. Also keeps pnpm overrides in the existing package.json pattern while patching audit findings.
…es package.json pnpm.overrides, not a new workspace file.
# Conflicts: # pnpm-lock.yaml
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request configures a self-hosted runner label and updates the release process with release-branch naming, staging validation, same-ref production promotion, and rollback instructions. ChangesRelease workflow
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/release-process.md`:
- Around line 30-33: Update the Branch naming table in the release-process
documentation to add a release/* row, using the timestamp format established by
“20: Deploy Staging” and matching the existing naming-table style.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 777655d6-3748-49e4-80a8-35094e94e474
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/actionlint.yamldocs/release-process.md
What changed
Why
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores