[CP Staging] Revert "Show the category description hint on the expense creation description field" - #101557
Conversation
|
🚧 mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here. |
…ptionHintOnExpenseCreation [CP Staging] Revert "Show the category description hint on the expense creation description field" (cherry picked from commit 7910636) (cherry-picked to staging by mountiny)
|
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
|
🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
|
|
🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.4.84-1 🚀
|
|
🤖 No help site changes are required for this revert. No draft PR created. Why: This PR only removes the inline category description hint from the expense creation confirmation page. The Description hint feature itself is untouched — admins still set it per category, and it still renders on the dedicated Description step at The two help articles that mention it describe only the admin-side setting, never where the hint surfaces during expense creation, so both remain accurate:
Verification details
Since there is no help site PR to link, there is nothing for you to review or mark |
|
🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.4.86-0 🚀
|
|
🤖 No help site changes are required for this revert. I did not create a draft PR. Why: the help site never documented where the category description hint renders, so reverting where it renders doesn't make any article wrong. The two places
Neither states that the hint appears on the expense creation confirmation screen, and after this revert the hint still renders in the Description step at Supporting detailWhat this PR changes. It reverts Show the category description hint on the expense creation description field, removing No docs drift was introduced. PR 101072 shipped zero files under The in-product copy is unaffected either way. Out of scope, flagged only: Label grounding: I verified "Description hint" against @mountiny — there is no linked help site PR to review, because no article needs to change. If you think one of the two articles above should be more specific about where the hint appears (for example, calling out that it shows on the Description field rather than on the expense creation confirmation screen), reply and I'll open the draft PR for it. |
|
🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.4.89-0 🚀
|
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.4.89-0 🚀
Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry): |
|
🤖 Still no help site changes required for this revert — and I've now confirmed it against the live UI, which is the verification I offered in my last comment. I did not create a draft PR. Live verification on dev NewDot web (local build at the revert commit
So the feature still works where the articles say it does. Neither One separate, pre-existing gap I found — your callThis is not caused by this PR, so I left it out of scope rather than bundling it into a revert-docs PR. Testing showed that Description hint is gated twice: the Category rules section only appears once the workspace Rules feature is enabled, and actually saving a hint requires the Control plan (Collect shows an "Unlock this feature" upgrade wall).
Reply and I'll open a draft PR adding the plan note (labelled Why I'm confident no revert-driven change is needed
@mountiny — there's no linked help site PR to review, because this revert doesn't require one. The only open question is the Control-plan note described above; say the word and I'll open that draft PR. |
|
🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.4.90-0 🚀
|





Reverts #101072
### Fixed issues
$ #101512
$ #101519
$ #101556