fix: update tests to match SDK type alias changes#50
Merged
Conversation
Updates test code to match the SDK changes where root models (like PaymentHandler and ReverseDomainName) were converted to type aliases: - Use payment_handler.Base instead of payment_handler.PaymentHandler constructor. - Remove fdc_req.FulfillmentDestinationCreateRequest wrapper and use shipping_destination.ShippingDestination directly. - Use TypeAdapter to validate ReverseDomainName instead of instantiating it. TAG=agy CONV=8eec77fa-d0ae-4394-9976-9a7bafa71f51
11 tasks
carolinerg1
approved these changes
Jul 10, 2026
This was referenced Jul 10, 2026
ptiper
approved these changes
Jul 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR updates the conformance tests to maintain compatibility with the Python SDK changes where root models (like
PaymentHandlerandReverseDomainName) were converted to type aliases.Type of change
Is this a Breaking Change or Removal?
!to my PR title (e.g.,feat!: remove field).Breaking Changes / Removal Justification
(N/A - This PR is a compatibility fix, not a breaking change itself.)
Checklist