Skip to content

Add path agreement and count-isolation invariants - #173

Merged
dnncha merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
reliability-path-agreement
Oct 28, 2026
Merged

dnncha merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
reliability-path-agreement

Conversation

@dnncha

@dnncha dnncha commented Oct 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Extends the scientific invariants with path agreement and count isolation.

  • Indexed Matcher and top-level scan paths must return identical status, target, distances, and match count for generated targets/reads across scan, Hamming, exact, and both policies.
  • safe_for_k1_hamming must equal the actual minimum pairwise Hamming distance, and minimum_hamming_distance must match it.
  • Feature-matrix counts must equal exactly the unique assignments, never ambiguous/none/invalid observations.

Local gates: make quality (2131 pytest passed / 11 skipped, compat39 14, typecheck 42 files, lint clean).

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-28T11:25:19.336942Z 4c90076 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@dnncha
dnncha merged commit 2a44da4 into main Oct 28, 2026
10 of 26 checks passed
@dnncha
dnncha deleted the reliability-path-agreement branch October 28, 2026 11:23

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 4c900765e0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant