Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
56 changes: 16 additions & 40 deletions site/src/content/reset-status/latest.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,62 +3,38 @@
"question": "Rate limit reset today?",
"answer": "no",
"confidence": "likely",
"observed_for_date": "2026-06-08",
"observed_for_date": "2026-06-09",
"timezone": "Asia/Shanghai",
"generated_at": "2026-06-08T08:19:17Z",
"generated_at": "2026-06-08T20:20:19Z",
"source_account": "@thsottiaux",
"source_url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux",
"search_url": "https://x.com/search?q=from%3Athsottiaux%20since%3A2026-06-07%20until%3A2026-06-09&src=typed_query&f=live",
"search_url": "https://x.com/search?q=from%3Athsottiaux%20since%3A2026-06-08%20until%3A2026-06-10&src=typed_query&f=live",
"judgment_mode": "ai_semantic_review",
"rationale": "Logged-in Chrome/X profile and broad X search were reachable for the 2026-06-08 Asia/Shanghai watch date. The visible local-day posts included a Codex 10X usage-limit promotion for selected builders, short replies about participation, and unrelated ChatGPT or Codex discussion. The usage-limit promotion is usage-adjacent, but it does not say limits reset, quotas recovered, message caps reset, or users should wait for a reset window. Thread context showed user replies asking about participation or complaining about limits, not a source-account reset signal. An older June 4 usage-limit reset post was visible, but it is outside today's observed date.",
"rationale": "Logged-in Chrome/X search and profile review were reachable for the 2026-06-09 Asia/Shanghai watch date. The visible local-day source-account posts were two replies: one clarified that ChatGPT messages do not burn Codex limits, and one encouraged frequent Codex use in a Codex-or-Claude thread. Third-party replies mentioned limits and resets, but @thsottiaux did not announce a reset, quota recovery, message-cap recovery, or reset window. The run occurred early in the local day, so later posts could change the answer.",
"evidence_posts": [
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 16:19 +08 observation",
"url": "https://x.com/search?q=from%3Athsottiaux%20since%3A2026-06-07%20until%3A2026-06-09&src=typed_query&f=live",
"published_at_label": "2026-06-09 04:20 +08 observation",
"url": "https://x.com/search?q=from%3Athsottiaux%20since%3A2026-06-08%20until%3A2026-06-10&src=typed_query&f=live",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "Logged-in Chrome/X search for @thsottiaux posts across the local-day coverage window returned six visible June 8 Asia/Shanghai candidate posts. None semantically announced a reset or recovery window."
"summary": "Logged-in Chrome/X search for @thsottiaux posts across the widened UTC coverage window returned four visible candidates. Two fell inside 2026-06-09 Asia/Shanghai, and neither semantically announced a reset, quota recovery, message-cap recovery, or reset window."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 06:21 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-07T22:21:38Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063748242681307611",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "@thsottiaux said Codex would select one person per day for 100 days to receive 10X usage limits for one month. This is usage-limit related, but it is a selective promotion, not a reset, quota recovery, message-cap recovery, or reset-window signal."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 11:33 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-08T03:33:50Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063826811373658213",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "@thsottiaux replied that users should build things when asked how to participate in the 10X usage-limit promotion. Immediate thread context included third-party limit complaints, but the source-account reply did not announce a reset or recovery."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 14:14 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-08T06:14:33Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063867254945767838",
"published_at_label": "2026-06-09 01:38 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-08T17:38:01Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2064039257392709683",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "@thsottiaux joked in a model-personality thread. It was unrelated to Codex rate limits, quotas, message caps, or reset windows."
"summary": "@thsottiaux replied in a Codex-or-Claude bug-solving thread by encouraging Codex use throughout the day. Immediate replies included user complaints about limits, but the source-account post did not announce reset or recovery behavior."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 07:59 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-07T23:59:43Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063772925644464276",
"published_at_label": "2026-06-09 01:35 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-08T17:35:20Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2064038582529221017",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "@thsottiaux replied agreement in a thread about ChatGPT's personal-assistant direction. It was product-direction discussion, not a rate-limit reset signal."
"summary": "@thsottiaux replied \"No\" to a question asking whether ChatGPT messages burn Codex limits. This was usage-accounting clarification, not a reset, quota recovery, message-cap recovery, or reset-window signal."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 07:53 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-07T23:53:47Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063771435194261915",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "@thsottiaux replied in a thread about loops and attached media. The reply was not about reset behavior, quotas, usage caps, or recovery windows."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 07:52 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-07T23:52:05Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063771005332697532",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "@thsottiaux replied to a coding-agent usage poll with an adoption comment. Third-party replies mentioned rate limits, but the source-account post did not announce a reset or cap recovery."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-04 08:25 +08 (outside observed_for_date; X datetime 2026-06-04T00:25:58Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2062329981548802523",
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 06:21 +08 (outside observed_for_date; X datetime 2026-06-07T22:21:38Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063748242681307611",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "An older @thsottiaux post did announce that Codex usage limits had been reset across paid plans. It confirms the target semantic pattern, but it is outside the June 8 watch date."
"summary": "The profile's latest visible original post remained the 10X usage-limit promotion for selected Codex builders. It is usage-limit related, but it is outside the watch date and does not announce a general reset or recovery window."
}
]
}