Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
I am requesting changes because the main task requirement—overriding Array.prototype.sort to use your custom sort2 implementation—is not yet fulfilled, which will cause tests that call [].sort() to fail. In src/arrayMethodSort.js, you correctly define [].__proto__.sort2 and handle comparator validation, default string comparison, stability, and sparse arrays, but you never actually assign this function to Array.prototype.sort. To fix this, add an assignment near the end of the file, right after the sort2 function definition (e.g., around the last lines), such as:
Array.prototype.sort = Array.prototype.sort2; // or [].__proto__.sort2This ensures that all normal calls like myArray.sort() use your custom logic, satisfying the core requirement. As a minor, non-blocking improvement, you might align your TypeError message with the native one and consider a more efficient algorithm than bubble sort for very large arrays. Your implementation is otherwise thoughtful and careful about edge cases, so with this small but crucial wiring change, it should fully meet the task expectations.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return this; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The task requires implementing Array.prototype.sort using the predefined [].__proto__.sort2, but this file only defines sort2 and never assigns it to the built-in sort. Consider adding an assignment such as Array.prototype.sort = Array.prototype.sort2; (or Array.prototype.sort = [].__proto__.sort2;) after this line so the task requirement is satisfied.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Your solution is approved because it correctly implements a custom Array.prototype.sort using your sort2 function and meets the functional requirements of the task. The implementation properly validates the comparator, supplies a default string-based comparison when none is provided, maintains stability by tracking original indices, and correctly handles sparse arrays, so normal arr.sort() calls should work as expected. As a small, optional improvement, you could adjust the TypeError message thrown when the comparator is invalid (in src/arrayMethodSort.js, where you check the argument type) to more closely match the native message, which can help with compatibility and debugging. Another non-blocking suggestion is to consider a more efficient algorithm than bubble sort (such as mergesort or quicksort) if you ever adapt this for very large arrays, since bubble sort is O(n^2) and can become slow at scale, even though it fully satisfies the current assignment. Overall, you’ve addressed the earlier missing-prototype-override issue well, and the code demonstrates a solid understanding of custom sorting behavior—nice work.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
| typeof compareFunction !== 'function' && | ||
| compareFunction !== undefined | ||
| ) { | ||
| throw new TypeError('Compare must be a function'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optional: the thrown TypeError message is fine functionally, but you might align it with the native message for clearer compatibility (this is not required by the task).
| for (let i = 0; i < items.length - 1; i++) { | ||
| for (let j = 0; j < items.length - 1 - i; j++) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bubble sort is used here which satisfies the task. As a non-blocking improvement for large arrays, consider implementing a more efficient sort (e.g., quicksort/mergesort) to reduce complexity.
No description provided.