Skip to content

Shot 2: no possessive Figma; ignore private/ - #21

Merged
mattonik merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/figma-trademark
Oct 13, 2026
Merged

mattonik merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/figma-trademark

Conversation

@mattonik

@mattonik mattonik commented Oct 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Figma confirmed we may reference Figma as long as we follow their Trademark Guidelines (https://www.figma.com/using-the-figma-brand/), which use Figma as an adjective and never in the possessive. Screenshot 2's subtitle said "Figma's keyboard shortcuts"; it now reads "Context menus, modifier keys and keyboard shortcuts."

The other public-facing uses (the app's labels, the review notes) already name Figma without the possessive. Code comments aren't brand use. The website gets the same fix in mattonik/icebear-digital.

Also ignores private/, where local-only drafts live (marketing copy, outreach notes, App Review mail). The repo is public, so these must never be committed.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

icebearsk and others added 2 commits October 13, 2026 08:22
Figma's trademark guidelines use Figma as an adjective, never possessive
("Figma's keyboard shortcuts"). The subtitle names the features instead.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Marketing copy, outreach notes and App Review mail live in private/ and must
never be committed; the repo is public.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@mattonik mattonik changed the title Shot 2: no possessive Figma (trademark guidelines) Shot 2: no possessive Figma; ignore private/ Oct 13, 2026
@mattonik
mattonik merged commit 0332d45 into main Oct 13, 2026
2 checks passed
@mattonik
mattonik deleted the claude/figma-trademark branch October 13, 2026 07:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants