Skip to content

Write down the steward's PR process and chip's advisory review #33

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
chip-peanut-bot merged 2 commits into from
Sep 30, 2026
Merged

Write down the steward's PR process and chip's advisory review #33

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
f47f6a1
Write down the steward's PR process and chip's advisory review
Sep 30, 2026
a05dbc0
Merge branch 'main' into docs/steward-pr-process
chip-peanut-bot[bot] Sep 30, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions CLAUDE.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ two is the remaining merge.
- **Push straight to `main`.** No PR, no review gate, no waiting. `main` is unprotected on purpose.
- **A push to `main` deploys to production within ~5 minutes.** There is no CI gate in front of it. Run the checks below yourself.
- Open a PR only when you actually want a second opinion, not as ceremony.
- **The steward (the box-resident Claude supervisor) never pushes to `main`.** Konrad and Hugo still may. Every steward change goes: branch → PR → chip's review → the steward's own QA → the steward merges it. No human approval is needed.
- **chip reviews every non-draft PR automatically** (advisory: a comment review, never request-changes). It reads this file and checks against mono `split-content/product/truths.md`. It takes about 5–10 minutes; comment `/chip review` on the PR to ask again.
- **Before merging, the steward reads chip's review** (`gh api repos/peanutprotocol/peanutsplit/pulls/<n>/reviews` and `/pulls/<n>/comments`). For each finding, fix it or reply on the thread saying why not. Never merge with an unanswered blocking or major finding.
- `.github/workflows/chip-pr-review.yml` is the review bridge. It must stay byte-identical to mono `ops/schedulers/pr-review/chip-pr-review.yml`; change it in mono, never here.
- Commit messages explain _why_. No AI co-author lines.

## What still holds
Expand Down
Loading