Repository navigation
test(codecs): JPEG fuzz, progressive read and write acceptance suites, disabled until IC-6 to IC-8 - #599
Merged
Conversation
…, disabled until IC-6 to IC-8
Contributor
|
Fast lane: merged into dev (249 lines, 4 files, Fast-Check marker). |
Closed
This was referenced Oct 19, 2026
Closed
prakashUXtech
added a commit
to qbtrix/creative-apps
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2026
…rallel (#3126) Moves the creative-core pin from bf5426e to 0de5687, the head of core `main` (green, promoted from dev). The range has the resident-rendering speedups from qbtrix/creative-core#620: the batched composite commits without waiting, the resident dirty check is storage identity instead of a pixel compare, and the Float16 tile upload vectorizes. It also has qbtrix/creative-core#626, which repoints the mutation anchor #620 moved. Core range (58 commits): qbtrix/creative-core@bf5426e...0de5687 Core PRs in the range: qbtrix/creative-core#567 qbtrix/creative-core#568 qbtrix/creative-core#569 qbtrix/creative-core#570 qbtrix/creative-core#571 qbtrix/creative-core#573 qbtrix/creative-core#574 qbtrix/creative-core#575 qbtrix/creative-core#576 qbtrix/creative-core#577 qbtrix/creative-core#578 qbtrix/creative-core#579 qbtrix/creative-core#580 qbtrix/creative-core#581 qbtrix/creative-core#582 qbtrix/creative-core#583 qbtrix/creative-core#584 qbtrix/creative-core#585 qbtrix/creative-core#586 qbtrix/creative-core#587 qbtrix/creative-core#588 qbtrix/creative-core#589 qbtrix/creative-core#590 qbtrix/creative-core#591 qbtrix/creative-core#592 qbtrix/creative-core#593 qbtrix/creative-core#594 qbtrix/creative-core#595 qbtrix/creative-core#596 qbtrix/creative-core#597 qbtrix/creative-core#598 qbtrix/creative-core#599 qbtrix/creative-core#600 qbtrix/creative-core#601 qbtrix/creative-core#602 qbtrix/creative-core#603 qbtrix/creative-core#605 qbtrix/creative-core#606 qbtrix/creative-core#607 qbtrix/creative-core#608 qbtrix/creative-core#609 qbtrix/creative-core#612 qbtrix/creative-core#613 qbtrix/creative-core#614 qbtrix/creative-core#615 qbtrix/creative-core#616 qbtrix/creative-core#617 qbtrix/creative-core#618 qbtrix/creative-core#619 qbtrix/creative-core#620 qbtrix/creative-core#621 qbtrix/creative-core#622 qbtrix/creative-core#623 qbtrix/creative-core#625 qbtrix/creative-core#626 Besides the pin: - `project.yml` gets the same revision, as in #3023. - `PhotoWorkspace.residentComposited` syncs a region's layer tiles across the cores (through `PhotoLayerComposite.inParallel`), as the CPU route renders its tiles. Steps keep their order. On a brush frame that crosses two tiles the sync went from about 0.73 ms to 0.39 ms. - `Tests/render-budgets.md` has the new 8K table and says where a resident brush frame's time goes. 8K brush frame, release on the M2 Pro (median of three runs; the Mac was loaded, with another Photo running): CPU 1.0 ms, GPU-resident 1.4 ms (was 1.7). The GPU route is still behind the CPU. Most of what's left is the display into the presenter's texture, which waits about 0.55 ms for the GPU because the presenter draws from its own queue. Full redraw on the resident route is 31 ms (was 35) and the first picture 166 ms (was 192). Checked locally on macOS: `scripts/bump-core`'s steps at 0de5687. `swift build --build-tests` passed. Every `*ModelTests` target passed except four Library wall-clock budget tests (`oneEditOnSixtyPhotosStaysInBudget`, `cullOneWithinBudget`, `beginImportWithinBudget`, `orderRebuildWithinBudget`), which went over in the parallel run on the loaded Mac and pass when run alone. The brush perf suites (PhotoBrushDisplayTests, PhotoBrushLatencyTests, PhotoBrushInkLatencyTests) passed. With the parallel sync on top, `PhotoModelTests` and `PhotoRenderBackendTests` passed (647 tests), and `PhotoRenderBudgetTests` ran in release with `Tests/SuiteUITests/SegmentedTabsTests.swift` set aside, since it doesn't link in release on SDK 27.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Last part of IC-2, after #590, #592 and #594. It adds the rest of the JPEG checks, each disabled until the task that implements it (lead.md rule 13). No Sources file changes.
What
JPEGFixturesgains two functions:progressive(f): a SOF2 stream (T.81 Annex G) carrying the same coefficients asbaseline(f). The scans are:Each AC scan holds one component over that component's own block grid (A.2.2).
refineAC: the G.1.2.3 refinement coding.JPEGFuzzTests(IC-6):thousandMutationsThrowOrDecode: 1000 mutated reads and 200 mutatedinfocalls.scanMutations: damages only the entropy-coded bytes, behind valid headers.seededValidStreamsDecode: 40 seeded random sizes, samplings and restart intervals, each within tolerance.The seeds cover grey, 4:2:0 and 4:2:2, restarts, and EXIF in both byte orders. Each mutated case must throw a
CodecErroror decode.JPEGReadTests, progressive half (IC-7):progressiveMatchesBaseline: grey and the three samplings. The progressive coding must read within 1/255 of the baseline coding and within the reference tolerance, andinfomust report progressive.acRefinement: AC values large enough that refinement carries every low bit and every ±1. It covers mutation.acRefinement. Zigzag positions 2–17 are 16 zero-history zeros in front of a coefficient with history, so the stream needs a ZRL with a held correction bit.damagedThrowsnow wrapsdropFirst()inData(...)so the slice starts at index 0.JPEGWriteTests(IC-8):qualityNinetyReopensqualityRangeunsupported; a side overmaxSidethrowstooLargestartsWithSOIAndJFIFinfoagreesannexKHuffmanTablesqualityScale.qualityScale. Below 50 the scale is 5000/q, otherwise 200 − 2q, and each entry is clamp((K·scale + 50)/100, 1, 255). Quality 50 gives K.1 exactly and 100 gives all oneslumaTables.lumaTables. The Y component's Tq names scaled K.1, and Cb/Cr name scaled K.2Spec sources and readings
Sources are ITU-T T.81 (A.2.2, A.4, Annex G (G.1.1.1.1, G.1.2.1 to G.1.2.3), B.2.4.1, B.2.4.2, Annex K) and JFIF 1.02.
Places where the spec leaves a choice, and the reading I picked:
write, a quality outside 1…100 isunsupported, as the IC-1 doc comment says.Validation
All expected values come from the spec or the formula above, never from a decoder. As a syntax check only, an independent decoder (Pillow 12.3) was used three ways:
scripts/ci: CI: PASS before and after the rebase on origin/dev (1808edc). This PR is 247 lines in 4 files.Refs #562
Belt-Lead: act-1a1511a1174-tlch
Feature: image-codecs
Slice: IC-a
Fast-Check: pass
Head: a0d47bd