[NO JIRA] Moving claude code bot reaction and comments collection job from claude-code-action repo

[moulougeta]

Context

[NO JIRA] Moving claude code bot reaction and comments collection job from claude-code-action repo

Checklist

• Change meets or does not compromise the Baseline Security Requirements

[platon-github-app-production]

Comment /request-review to automatically request reviews from the following teams:

• continuous-integration: notifications will be sent to #ci-pub

You can also request review from a specific team by commenting /request-review team-name, or you can add a description with --notes "<message>"

💡 If you see something that doesn't look right, check the configuration guide.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Changes: Maintenance (1)

This PR migrates a GitHub Actions workflow from the claude-code-action repository to this repository. The workflow collects and summarizes feedback (reactions and replies) on Claude bot comments across repositories in the transferwise organization.

Changes:

• Added a scheduled workflow that runs nightly to gather Claude bot feedback statistics

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

The Claude bot detection logic is duplicated in two places (lines 158-163 and lines 242-243). Consider extracting this into a helper function to ensure consistency and easier maintenance.

Suggested change

	// Find Claude bot comments (checking for common bot usernames)
	const claudeComments = allComments.filter(comment => {
	const username = comment.user?.login?.toLowerCase() || '';
	return username.includes('claude') ||
	(username === 'github-actions[bot]' && comment.body?.includes('Claude')) ||
	username.includes('claude-bot') ||
	username.includes('claudebot');
	});
	// Helper to determine if a comment is from the Claude bot (or related bots)
	function isClaudeBotComment(comment) {
	const username = comment.user?.login?.toLowerCase() || '';
	return username.includes('claude') ||
	(username === 'github-actions[bot]' && comment.body?.includes('Claude')) ||
	username.includes('claude-bot') ||
	username.includes('claudebot');
	}
	// Find Claude bot comments (checking for common bot usernames)
	const claudeComments = allComments.filter(isClaudeBotComment);

[Copilot]

This bot detection logic is inconsistent with the more comprehensive check on lines 158-163. It misses checking for 'github-actions[bot]', 'claude-bot', and 'claudebot' variations. Use the same detection logic as above to avoid missing valid Claude bot comments.

Suggested change

	// Check if comment is after Claude's and within our time window
	return commentTime > claudeTime &&
	commentTime >= cutoffTime &&
	comment.user?.login?.toLowerCase() !== 'claude' &&
	!comment.user?.login?.toLowerCase().includes('claude');
	const login = comment.user?.login?.toLowerCase() || '';
	// Check if comment is after Claude's and within our time window and not from a bot user
	return commentTime > claudeTime &&
	commentTime >= cutoffTime &&
	login !== 'claude' &&
	login !== 'claude-bot' &&
	login !== 'claudebot' &&
	login !== 'github-actions[bot]' &&
	!login.endsWith('[bot]');

[Copilot]

The logic checks if truncatedComment.length === 100 but should check if the original reply.body?.substring(0, 100) operation actually truncated content by comparing against reply.body?.length. A comment with exactly 100 characters won't get the ellipsis, while one with 101+ characters will, but this check doesn't accurately reflect whether truncation occurred.

Suggested change

	const commentDisplay = truncatedComment.length === 100 ? truncatedComment + '...' : truncatedComment;
	const commentDisplay = reply.body && reply.body.length > 100 ? truncatedComment + '...' : truncatedComment;