refactor: rename vortex-geo to vortex-spatial - #9284
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 1944 untouched benchmarks
🆕 34 new benchmarks
⏩ 42 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress[u32, (10000, 256)] |
100.4 µs | 83.9 µs | +19.71% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | cold_misaligned[(64, 256)] |
5.1 ms | 4.4 ms | +17.85% |
| 🆕 | Simulation | column_x_column_points |
N/A | 470.4 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | column_x_column_polygons |
N/A | 650.6 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | constant_x_nullable_points |
N/A | 1.5 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | constant_x_nullable_polygons_disjoint |
N/A | 1.7 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | constant_x_points |
N/A | 1.4 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | constant_x_polygons_disjoint |
N/A | 1.5 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | nullable_polygons_90pct_x_constant_point |
N/A | 588.7 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | nullable_polygons_x_nullable_points |
N/A | 702.7 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | polygons_x_constant_point |
N/A | 467.4 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | column_x_column_polygons |
N/A | 623 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | nullable_points_x_constant |
N/A | 1.5 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | nullable_polygons_disjoint_x_constant |
N/A | 1.8 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | points_x_constant |
N/A | 1.4 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | polygons_disjoint_x_constant |
N/A | 1.5 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | polygons_overlapping_x_constant |
N/A | 1.4 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | nullable_point_column_x_constant_point |
N/A | 753.6 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | point_column_x_constant_point |
N/A | 559.1 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | point_column_x_point_column |
N/A | 731.4 µs | N/A |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing codex/vortex-spatial-rename (e2863b5) with develop (66c447e)
Footnotes
-
42 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩