Skip to content

docs: drop the hand-written rpk connect run flags table - #1859

Closed
JakeSCahill wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cleanup/connect-run-curated-flags
Closed

docs: drop the hand-written rpk connect run flags table#1859
JakeSCahill wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cleanup/connect-run-curated-flags

Conversation

@JakeSCahill

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Resolves the duplicate-Flags conflict found in review on docs-extensions-and-macros#225: rpk connect run had a hand-written Flags table (authored in rpk-overrides.json back when plugin help exposed no flag data) that now collides with the auto-extracted table. The generator's conflict rule keeps the curated section and skips extraction with a warning — this PR takes the warning's advice and adopts the extracted table, which is both fresher and fuller:

Hand-written Extracted
Flags documented 7 (stale) 13, incl. --secrets, --redpanda-license, the telemetry flags, --rpc-plugins
Stays current manual edits only every regeneration

The per-flag description overrides stay — they merge onto the extracted rows, so the curated log.level/set/resources wording survives (verified: regenerated with the 5.3.0 branch, one == Flags section, 13 rows, curated descriptions applied).

Note: the page won't reflect this until the first regeneration with doc-tools ≥ 5.3.0 lands (flag extraction doesn't exist before it), so merge order vs #225's release train doesn't matter — this just needs to be in before the next regen.

Written when plugin help carried no flag data, so the generator could
not produce a table. Flag extraction now documents 13 flags for this
command (the hand table listed 7 and had gone stale), and with both
present the page rendered two conflicting == Flags sections. The
per-flag description overrides stay: they merge onto the extracted
table, so the curated log.level, set, and resources wording survives.

Verified by regenerating with the doc-tools 5.3.0 branch: one Flags
section, 13 rows, curated descriptions applied.
@JakeSCahill
JakeSCahill requested a review from a team as a code owner July 31, 2026 08:32
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for redpanda-docs-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6f603ec
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/redpanda-docs-preview/deploys/6a6c5d9193f29a0008612e17
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1859--redpanda-docs-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@JakeSCahill, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 49 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d31dbb01-cf8d-429b-b417-d857745332c5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 32c36c6 and 6f603ec.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs-data/rpk-overrides.json

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@JakeSCahill

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded by #1865, which does everything this PR did plus per-flag description overrides for four more flags (chilled, watcher, env-file, templates). Closing in its favor.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant